Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown
I believe the precedent being set is you're always responsible for your actions, whether deliberate or not. He smoked an unsuspecting official and should have had ample time to move/react. 20 games is harsh, as it seemed reckless but not deliberate. I would have given 10 games.
|
I suppose, but I do think that makes for a bad precedent. If they rule it intentional , fine, 20 sounds right. I think if they do rule that way,the appeal is much more likely to succeed.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|