Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
You're hilarious! Lipson is very partisan. He's trying to prevent the Obama Presidential Libary from being at the Univeristy of Chicago for crying out loud. You are also aware that this is the 2nd Lipson article that you've posted as support, but from a different publisher.
That's the absolute perfect example of the echo chamber in action. You post two separate articles from different sites that say essentially the exact same thing. Well of course they do, they are written by the same person. Did you also notice that Lipson quotes Fox News for the FBI angle. Did so in the other article as well. But keep plugging away on this. I'm sure you can find a third and fourth article by Lipson, or one that quotes his article, about the Clinton email "scandal." What I'm waiting for is another article from Alison that quotes another that quoted him, completing the circular reference!
|
You have to read things before you talk about them. I have only posted one Lipson article. The other was a completely different one from the Observer. Pay attention, dude.
Also, I just googled Lipson and Obama, like you obviously did because you like to attack sources, and not address arguments. He opposed the Obama Library because he opposed Chicago's association with what would be a very partisan library and think-tank.
In regards to Clinton, I tend to see smoke as a sign of fire. I would love to be proven wrong, but until there is a definitive statement from both the State Department and FBI, I will presume her guilty.
So are you insinuating that the talk about an FBI investigation is partisan in itself? Oh man, here is another source making allegations that the State Department is making it difficult for the FBI. Make sure to read it, ok?
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_...clinton_emails