Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Here you are, bothered by the fact that a random person you don't even know doesn't feel the same way about Scott as you do. Of all the issues, this is what bothers you. You said something condemning letting such simple things be bothersome.
Can't we all agree that arguments against enjoying John Scott's participation are completely valid? He does NOT have a great track record. Whether you loved it or hated it (I loved it), neither is close to invalid. Anyone who didn't just buy into the magic blindly isn't a pathetic person.
As usual, media is ruining this. They were negative when he was voted in, and now I just read an article titled "For just one day, John Scott saved hockey." Ugh.
|
I'm not bothered by him having a different opinion than me. I've discussed the merits and flaws of his opinions and counters to my own like a gentlemen and with fair consideration and openness. I said I felt sorry for him and pity his perspective, because it's such a minuscule event that we as people will encounter. Likewise, his opinion is minuscule and meaningless to me. You confuse my courtesy of replying to being bothered.
Agreeing with his participation is separate from being upset that someone is enjoying themselves. The participation issue was closed the minute he stepped on to the ice. If that issue lingers long enough to create an antipathy towards someone who's having one of the best day of their lives at the expense of nobody, then it's now excessive hostility. For such a negative emotion to conquer someone over something that impacts their lives none is sad IMO.