Like many are saying here, I don't think it was deliberate or malicious but it was an accident that happened and needs to have repercussions if only to keep reputation with everyone and the refs. Just like if you were to accidentally back into someones vehicle or rear end someone, you weren't intending it but it still happened and you have to pay the consequences. I think 5-10 will end up being the verdict it's kind of that mid region and fits the bill. I had voted 0 originally but hadn't looked at the rulebook at the time but can also understand the nomenclature of the rules regarding this case and 5-10 will more than likely be the case.
The other thing that's annoying and does nothing but stir the pot up is this whole strawman "Well what if it had been so-n-so?" argument. Guess what how 'bout we just deal with who it actually involved and leave it at that.
__________________
"As far as I'm concerned I take it one day at a time because if you look too far down the road that's when you get yourself in trouble. You've gotta enjoy the process and not be burdened by the outcome." - Jon Gillies
Last edited by FeyWest; 01-29-2016 at 02:59 PM.
|