Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
All of this is just your impression of how you think Wideman reacted and why, balanced against how you think he might have reacted were he doing something different than you imagine him to be doing.
So, in short, no. None of this even remotely eliminates the possibility that Wideman responded to the official with motive.
|
It doesn't eliminate the possibility, no. But it's not how I think he reacted (though it makes sense to me). It's also what he said about it. So not only does it make sense to me, it is what his evidence is. So he has to be lying as well as being an idiot, which doesn't match any of his history or the fact he has a letter.