Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I would argue that not being able to defend your argument in debate, is a sign that you have lost a debate.
I contend that if the officials thought that a player deliberately assaulted one of them, that they would have ejected the player. You obviously disagree.
|
You haven't made an argument that actually challenges mine. Christ. Why don't you just double down and go with "what if the player snaps his stick in half and then stabs the linesman through the heart with it it?" as a question.
Your contention expressed here is also a case of moving the goalposts. You said that you felt the referees could go watch a video and then retroactively asses a penalty. I told you that is false. Changing your argument to a more general "if they felt he abused an official then they would throw him out" is very much true, but very much not your original argument.