Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
What are you even on about? The most obvious answer? Occam's Rasor only addresses minimizing assumptions. You are not required to assume anything to determine how obviously intentional this was. Watch the video.
This is hilarious... How is the poll that close?
|
Because people who actually watched the game knew what happened.
What's hilarious is people making conclusions about where Wideman was looking, how much time he had to react when he was right up to the linesman and so on, based on a short video.
It's pretty clear to me what happened. He was hurt, staggering to the bench, wasn't looking, saw the linesman out of the corner of his eye and only had time to get his hands up. You can even see him jump to the side a little, but it wasn't in time. And the lineman went down hard not because he was "drilled" but because he was skating backwards and didn't expect a bump from behind. Knocks that are unseen are always worse.