Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Well I don't think asking questions about these things should have people pejoratively labelled? Is there an obvious explanation for the data that seems to conflict the original report? Seems like we are pressing politicians to make some major changes to our society in the name of climate change, so asking questions and wanting to confirm its accuracy doesn't strike me as completely irresponsible.
|
You have to be trolling at this point, as the article they reference doesn't actually support there complaints. Since they cant add 25 to 2008 which is 2033 not 2016, which is the earliest they discuss in the article. Other predictions are a 100 years out.