Quote:
Originally Posted by Agamemnon
All of the points were in response to oilers_fan. You picked one to respond to, but wouldn't respond to the others because 'they weren't adressed to you'. None of them were, so thats a Lame point.
|
Wow.
Here, since you're too lazy to go back and actually read the intial post, I'll help you.
Quote:
|
(1) As for why the Liberals are "making hay" on this issue is because our original mandate was the secure the urban areas and keep the Taliban, run out of the cities by the US, from coming back to the urban areas. Under the Conservatives, the mandate has changed from defensive to offensive. We're heading out into the country and taking out targets.
|
Now who brought up that? Was it oilers_fan? Did he say 'anything' about the Liberals?
Quote:
|
(2) oilers_fan: Which rules would you want our troops to break?
|
Ah, the infamous question directed at oilers_fan. I guess you didn't notice the bolded part, eh?
Quote:
|
(3) I really think that the Green party makes a good point. There are many Muslim members of the United Nations. Having Canadian troops there makes it look like an occupation by overwhelmingly Christian countries. Canada should send supplies and money and help with the training, but these suicide bombers *might* think twice before blowing up other Muslims. Our troops are needed in other areas of the world where it wouldn't be seen as a Christian occupation.
|
And here is the other point that was brought up. Again, where was it directed at oilers_fan?
No quote, no nothing.
BTW, this is the post where I get the "christian" occupation quote from. Since you choose to defend it, provide evidence that...
Quote:
|
Our troops are needed in other areas of the world where it wouldn't be seen as a Christian occupation force.
|