Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie
never written a patent I take it.
Sadly, many patents nowadays get granted simply based on thought experiments. No proof of concept is needed. Especially it seems in science. And even if you do provide proof of concept you can pretty much cover anything you want that is remotely related.
That patent is actually pretty straight forward in coverage!
|
No, but if they are written too broadly, shouldn't they be, in effect, unenforceable? I know there have already been talks about this process (multiple different layers), more than a month ago. I would think there would already be prior art.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|