Read through that, I still find it ridiculous.
"The Arbitrator found that the City did not meet this obligation. He found that the snow-covered ditch which led to the tobogganing accident was a hidden danger. The City knew about it, but did not take reasonable steps to warn tobogganers of this danger."
They banned tobogganing from the site. That's not reasonable enough warning?
"The Plaintiff Did Not Willingly Assume the Risk of Injury"
Lol wut? You're sliding down ice on a piece of plastic.
And the EDM lady in a place that she shouldn't have been?
These all seem like arguments FOR the city.
__________________
|