Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
A large part of the discussion has to do with finance, at least enough to create a question of motivation in some of the science.
|
I would think the financial motivation on the other side of the debate (ie multi-billion dollar corporations and economies looking to keep the status quo), vastly out-weights what some scientists looking to get grant funding might benefit from.
I mean the vast majority of O/G Calgarians would continue to benefit financially if the whole global warming thing was a hoax, yet even they understand the realities. These days, the argument is not about questioning the environmental impact, it's typically about the economic impact.