An interesting topic, with a lot of moving parts. Some of this, I've seen as a tendency for films with strong performances by black, asian or hispanic actors to be genre films. The Oscars are notorious for only rewarding dramatic films while ignoring anything else of value.
Also, sometimes there are just not strong enough performances in a year. Idris Elba is one of my favorite actors, but Beasts of No Nation wasn't his strongest performance, it was just solid. Compare that to Forest Whitaker in Last King of Scotland, and Whitaker was a force of nature. At the same time, Whitaker in Ghost Dog was strong enough to enter the conversation, but never a peep was uttered, because it was a genre film. Lots of variables.
This years Golden Globes also opened my eyes a little toward some of the grudges and favoritism that permeates Hollywood. Mel Gibson has worked harder to better himself personally after his racist rant than most historical figures showcasing scumbag behavior. He got himself sober, reapplied himself to work and community, and generally turned his personal life around. But at the Globes, it was reported that no one would even talk to him for fear of endangering their own careers by association. It made me wonder how much anger/racism/grudge holding, is happening behind the scenes.
I'm sure there are racists in positions of power holding some sway over proceedings like the Oscars, but the sheer number of eligible voters would be enough to counteract most of that effect.
I've lost my train of thought. Quick, to the Batmobile!
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|