I look at Charlie Hebdo the same way I do the Westboro Baptist family. I don't condone violence against either, but neither deserve defending for the things they do even if it falls under free speech.
I condemn the attack on them, but also their publication. I don't see why some people think it has to be one or the other. Neither is worthy of defending IMO.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|