View Single Post
Old 01-14-2016, 02:38 PM   #12
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
Well, you could say that about LA last season. But they are back in the game, they are spending money and will likely win a couple more cups in the next 10 years. I don't quite get this long-term investment attitude for an NHL franchise business. What's long-term these days? Star forwards reaching their peak by 23-24 years of age. Star defensemen - a bit later. When DO you invest short-term and pay heavily to get a cup now? Nobody knows at the end of regulation which team has the best chances to win the cup. So, it's always gonna be somewhat a gamble. I believe this is just another politically correct way of saying: "the owners told us not to spend too much money at this point".

Not saying that a team needs to sell its best assets for questionable benefits. But to say that ALL our trades will be only for long-term benefit tells me that the team doesn't even hope for winning the cup in the near future. That's not right. I sincerely hope I am wrong assuming this.
Except LA had just won a cup the year before and had virtually the same team that they missed the POs. Their miss was the anomaly, not the fact they are well in now.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post: