Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
I didn't ignore it. I posted a link in response. The rest have been discussed in length before. I disagree, I hold a different opinion. A silly one at that according to you. And I am the ignorant one?
And sure, let's pick posts apart about who used the word X or Y. Like that makes a difference, it meant the same thing. What are we, 14 years old?
Back on topic....
|
You did not answer the question. You posted a link to an article saying Notley supports TMX in an effort to discredit the "campaigning against pipelines" part of my question in hopes of discreditting the higher level business and finance rootings of the question. You knew exactly what you were doing. I am assuming you know that Notley opposes KXL and Gateway which makes that part of the question valid. Must I really provide links to that?
Again, I welcome you to make a logical arguement against the following statement. Try to do it without using the words NDP or Notley so as to keep it rooted in finance and economic theory as the question is posed instead of politics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude
Higher corporate taxes, higher carbon taxes, royalty framework uncertainty, and campaigning against pipelines all have directionally negative consequences on the oil and gas industry in Alberta.
|