I'm not, I'm simply saying they feel like it was a good choice for them. I don't know who pushed it through, or who it benefits. If it went to public vote or what. All I'm saying is there's different things to consider here and using them as an example. Reductive thought is just that. Reductive. A lot of the arguments from the con side have zero substance or thought. Just the same old tired cliches. There are some good arguments on the con side. I'm just giving those who are not looking at all the angles something to consider.
And yes, obviously we don't know how it all worked out yet.
|