Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour
I'm one of the 25% in favour. This is based on an assumption that what Ken King presented to the public was a watered down version of what has been presented to the city. I'm assuming this, because that's a fairly typical strategy - dumb it down for Joe Public. However, perhaps I missed something? Has it been confirmed the information given to the city was a print out of the PowerPoint given to the public?
Also, Nenshi's comments regarding Bettman sounded petty. Nenshi shoudl be better than that.
|
So you admit to not knowing anything about the proposal submitted to the city, but have concluded Nenshi's comments are the problem.