Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
I think you are oversimplifying the due process concept. I think you need a better understanding of the due process clause and the interpretations from the Supreme Court. Because these restriction lists affect controlled products or spaces, the due process expectation is greatly limited. You are going to have to explain how these restriction lists deprive anyone from "life, liberty, or [freely available] property."
In respect to air travel, that is not a protected or constitutional right. This is regulated and being allowed to travel by air is a privilege, not a right. In respect to weapon ownership, there are laws which restrict ownership should an individual meet specific criteria. There are also restrictions on types of weapons you may own, and specific processes you have to go through to own such weapons. Due cause is enough to restrict an individual from having access to weapons.
|
The Supreme Court interprets "due process" to all basic rights. That's been established repeatedly. The right to bear arms has also been established. Unless you plan on getting the Supreme Court to change it's interpretations you'll have to work with due process on how you find yourself on a "No gun list"