Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
I think we're arguing two different things. I thought azure and street pharmacist had meant simply being on a no fly list was unconstitutional in and of itself, since people keep saying "due process".
The gun part of it is another ball of wax, if one trusts the process of how people get on the list I could see a solid argument for "you've been deemed a threat to national security, you can't buy guns". Not really that far of a reach from the Patriot Act to get there.
|
I thought they were referring to the Gun list, and using the no-fly list as an example.
I don't think it's a big reach either, but the big problem is that it's written in the Bible...ermm.... the Constitution. And there are a lot of people who think that document is infallible and should be forever unchanged.