View Single Post
Old 01-05-2016, 11:55 PM   #33
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt View Post
Great comparison. Terrorists and police. BRILLIANT. Nothing at all is lost when comparing North Korea vs Americas right to nukes, and the police and terrorists rights to weapons. Wow. You must be a Harvard grad.

We are the police, they are the terrorists. I can feel my chakras lining up and my mind expanding just by speaking with you fellows. This is enlightening. Nik- believes he knows exactly what reality is, who is living in reality and who isn't. (Quite the ability.)

Wimbledon believes western world doesn't include Canada.

And you are here comparing terrorists and policemen...to wether or not nations should be allowed to have something that we have, and we are not showing any interest in getting rid of.

If I had my own country crumpystan, I wouldn't be trying to get nukes, I'd be advocating for disarmament. However if I noticed nobody was taking disarmament seriously, not least the nations with the nukes already - I would say OK well the dudes who have the nukes are perfectly content keeping them with no interest in destroying their weapons. Also who chooses which nation is terrorist or police? Their background, race, religion? the UN. Haha.

So why have a double standard. Who gave you the moral high ground to decide who is police and who is terrorist in the world of politics.. OK so you believe Iran and NK are terrorist and shouldn't have WMD. So who should? Please answer that. Give me a list of 10 nations who should have nukes, or the police for the sake of your analogy.

There is only one country that has used an atomic bomb on people. Hint: It's not Pakistan.

You are so pro establishment and so indoctrinated you wouldn't know a terrorist unless he was screaming Allahu Akbar.

Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

So can you think of any nations that do that? Or is it just bearded idiots running about in the Middle East.

It's funny I read a newspaper in France describe anders brevik the Norway killer as someone who used terrorist like tactics. ???? The man was a terrorist he killed 77 Norwegian kids on an island because he hated Islam. How is it that we label one person a terrorist and not the other. As if terrorist means one specific very small thing.

Hiroshima Nagasaki is literally the best example of terrorism in the history of the world.

I pray for your brains.
Where to start?....

The dropping of the bombs on Japan, likely saved millions of lives. Had the US fought a ground war against Japan estimates are it would have cost 400-800,000 American lives, and that does not even include Japanese casualties. As sadistic as it sounds, the show of force by the US was damn near an act of mercy. An invasion of Japan would have been catastrophic for both countries. Like it or not, it was probably the best case scenario for nuclear weapon deployment. As crappy as it was for those that lost their lives, it saved countless others.

Secondly, there is a difference between the US, Russia, and North Korea. The US, and Russia (as much as people don't like to admit it) aren't run by mad men that have enslaved their own citizens. Even though we my not like their form of freedom, Russia is a democracy, a somewhat corrupt one, but who's to say the US isn't to a degree as well. But at the end of the day, their nuclear arsenals aren't controlled by complete maniacs. Even if Putin or Obama, tomorrow, demanded all the nukes be launched, it wouldn't happen. There are enough people in place, to stop that from happening.

NK however, sadly, worships their leader like a god. And their god is a complete mad man. A country like that, does not deserve, or have the responsibility to have the destructive power of a WMD.

Either way, even if they have the means to blow one up, I highly, highly doubt, they have the means to deliver such a device. Their airforce is right out of the 50's, and being so isolated from the world for the last 50 years, is is extremely doubtful, they would have a missile system even remotely capable of getting it within range of a worthy target.
pylon is offline   Reply With Quote