Quote:
Originally Posted by cDnStealth
I've got one episode left but I feel there has to be some critical evidence not presented in this series. I simply cannot fathom how a jury could convict Brendan based on what we're shown. If they thought he was originally telling the truth then surely there would be some evidence of him being inside Avery's trailer. I wonder why his own lawyer didn't want to show the court the end of his "confession" video where he tells his mom that the detectives "got in his head."
|
It's pretty simple, according to the one juror that was excused in the Steve Avery case. In that one he said there were 3 people who had the guilty mindset from the beginning of deliberations, and simply wouldn't budge. The longer that goes on, the more tired the rest of the jurors get, and they start to change their votes just to get out of there and go home. That's why that bull#### press conference that slimebag prosecutor had before anything went to trial was so damaging, you had them calling Steve and Brendan guilty before they even had a chance to mount a defense