Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Neither you, nor I have that information. I could read through the evidence presented in the one indictment against him, but even then, we have no idea if it is enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. There is a reason (besides statute expiring) that only one charge has been pressed thus far.
I'm just getting at the fact its all just speculation right now, lets see what happens at trail. He likely did some shady stuff, but acting as if he is 100% guilty just based on media reports and cases coming forward isn't how the justice system in our countries is setup. He is afforded the presumption of innocence, even though the media has rendered him guilty.
|
I agree he deserves his date in court. But with all the information out there I'm comfortable saying there isn't reasonable doubt that he raped women. At least for me. You are welcome to have a different viewpoint.
I fully understand how our justice system works - but that doesn't mean we can't draw our own conclusions.
I think you are taking an odd stance in this debate, unless it is being done to be intentionally contrary. I think terming all of this as "speculation" is minimizing all the information available. Just as it is to say he did some "shady stuff".
You can have your opinion though.