Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
So as one of the hundred or so election issues they offered no details about what changes they'd bring in but you claim that is a mandate, I disagree. If they truly mean getting a consensus from all parties that would be a step in the right direction but still not as good as letting the people decide. If "an all-party Parliamentary committee" means a majority of Liberals pushing through their preference then it's not so great.
|
I don't disagree entirely.
Framing this as some off-the-cuff move by a dictatorship? I do disagree.
As with many of the hundred or so election issues every party represents, there is always a shortage of precise details until a party has been elected. This is not new nor is it party specific.
Abolish FPTP, use an all-party committee to find a new system, introduce legislation within 18 months.
What other details would you want?