Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeyman
I'm not saying it's not legal. I was trying to point out that they had tried to vote in members to represent their views. I think it's important because they didn't just all of a sudden decided after the fact... this was their only way at being involved.
I think he has every right to understand what's being said, proposed, argued, rejected. Understanding the path to a decision, not just being made aware of the decision.
|
I don't think that he does have the right to know what's going on and anyway that would be a case under the condominium act and not the human rights act.
When at the end he was asked if he had any questions he didn't ask any. What was he there to observe? Did he have specific questions about the legitimacy of the proxies, the management company, the budget, or anything. Typically no one even shows up at AGMs.
And gathering proxies to get quorum, boot off terrible board members, pass bylaw amendments is sometimes required to keep a condo moving.