View Single Post
Old 12-19-2015, 07:00 PM   #65
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major View Post
Really? But with less term or something? That would make me sad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
I don't think that's correct. I remember the reports saying the Flames weren't willing to offer anything close to what New Jersey did.
I'm not entirely sure what to make of this, but Treliving said:

“We tried, I can honestly say,” Treliving said about trying to re-sign the Calgary club’s leading marksman last season.

“The credit goes to our ownership. They made a number of significant proposals at varied terms, varied dollar amounts … I can assure our fans that every effort was made to bring Mike back.

“This is not a situation where we weren’t prepared, where we didn’t offer what I consider significant dollars. In some cases, on an annual basis, it was more than competitive.”


http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/07/01...calgary-flames

Not sure if that means we offered more after all, but sounds like it might have been? We might not have been willing to offer the 5 years New Jersey did.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post: