Hmmm yeah, no talk about his program or his formula. Where are said 'facts' and said 'science'?
Also interesting that this is published in The Star.
For the record, I don't believe it was a controlled demolition or anything like that. I do have many questions about the event, questions even that lead to wonder if the Stares knew about the attacks and even sponsored them.
(in some way or some fashion, some branch or shadowy group. Not saying this is my strongest belief, but there are so many questions that are still left because the government has acted so poorly and so secretive about the whole thing. If they admitted honest mistakes and didn't have such a weird track record afterwards, than maybe many wouldn't feel this way)
But this is a pretty weak argument against that. There is no proof, facts, or science in this article.
|