View Single Post
Old 12-08-2015, 12:43 PM   #5
JJ1532
First Line Centre
 
JJ1532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
I think this is better than the way they were doing it, but I still feel like there are situations that it should be used. How hard is it to have "If you fired them, you get no compensation" as part of the rule. Seems pretty simple to me.
I agree. Seems pretty ridiculous that they didn't cover this when they first implemented the compensation rule.

But now after the Torts hiring, they have totally scrapped it? Jeez, like you said, keep the rule, but have a part in there that says if the coach/GM/whatever is no longer in his job, even if he still has a contract, then compensation rules don't apply. It really isn't that difficult.
JJ1532 is offline   Reply With Quote