Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
I think this is better than the way they were doing it, but I still feel like there are situations that it should be used. How hard is it to have "If you fired them, you get no compensation" as part of the rule. Seems pretty simple to me.
|
I agree, if you poach an executive you should pay compensation. But if they're under contract but 'fired' then no way.
Its bad for teams and its bad for the Coaches/Managers.
"I'd love to hire *whomever* but hes under contract and not worth a 2nd/3rd rounder."
Although, to be fair, it was a pretty stupid rule to begin with.