Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
I am not saying it's ideal, but it's an option. I've done it. Unsafe conditions, whatever, some sort of negligence usually. It's on contingency usually.
|
Didn't you hear the man? There is NO recourse. NONE. So, obviously Psycnet can demonstrate that people in that scenario have no right to sue.
As an aside, I would very much appreciate it, Psycnet, if you could actually link the bill you said was passed in 2014. Because I can't find it on the legislature's list of bills passed in the 28th Assembly, while the one and only time the word "farm" is mentioned, it is to explicitly exclude farms from certain parts of the code. I would be interested to read the actual bill and what it amended.