The organization gave Ortio that one way in this 2 years contract.
Could have easily been a one year two way for last year only.
He probably "earned" that, or someone somewhere in our organization thought Ortio deserved such contract.
Hartley proceeded to declare him 3rd string before the season even began, when clearly all three goalies were crappy during pre-season.
Ramo kept bombing and kept getting the net was completely unfair.
Changing his own rule book for loser loses the net was unfair.
There was no way to decide Ramo was better, since Ortio never played.
I took it you have been watching practices since you constantly reminded me of how crappy Ortio has been during practices.
It does matter how Ramo is doing!
We could have getten better results from Ortio.
We are probably better off with Ortio heading into the future rather than two aging UFAs.
Either we are winning, or building for the futures.
Either case, Ortio should have gotten more chances, especially when Ramo clearly did not earn any.
Felt like you are running in circle, to the point that "it doesn't matter how Ramo did".
I am ending it for me.
|