I am not disagreeing Ortio earned nothing.
I said all three goalies have been crappy, but the truth remained Ortio was never given the chances anywhere comparable to Ramo and Hiller.
I should not be using a 4 games sample size, it was just to point out PepsiFree's (not completely true) statement.
And according to the same theory, please stop using a 11 games sample size where Ramo had been widely inconsistent too.
Ramo has been equally as crappy as the other two throughout 2015-2016.
Ramo did not earn nothing neither, he WAS given the net because of "stability".
And it was probably BT's decision to send Ramo down, I would guess Hartley probably wanted Ortio down all along.
Please listen to your own advice and stop picking and choosing the 4 games where Ortio gave up 19 goals.
"Body of work?"
Now we are being totally subjective.
The games I have been watching, Ramo has been crappy the majority of the time.
Inconsistent rebound controls, too much movement, too easily getting out of positions and a tendency to give up untimely softies that completely killed momentums.
Hartley is playing favourites, regardless of the actual performances.
Stop justifying for him.
|