Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
No, FF PHD, I am not ignoring the fact that both Ramo and Ortio were playing poorly. I am very much aware of that fact. The question is why you two are ignoring the fact that, once given the reins, Ramo's play improved dramatically. Seriously, what is the point of your argument? Are you angry that Hartley chose to change up something that was not working at all? Would you rather he kept doing the exact same things that were part of why we were playing .300 hockey out of some misguided sense of unfairness that a goalie who played poorly in training camp, poorly in the regular season and apparently poorly in practice wasn't getting more ice time?
|
Really? As I said above...
Quote:
Oh yes,
Nov 3 - 5 Goals on 41 shots. 0.873 sv% Ramo, You get the next start cuz you saved 36 shots.
Nov 10 - 4 Goals on 31 shots. 0.871 sv% Ramo, You still get the next start cuz you know we have 3 games in next 5 days, need you used to getting beat a lot.
Nov 12 - He losses again. 3 goals on 29 shots.
No 13 - Now we have a back to back and you've lost 2 in a row. Nope you will stay in the net until that other idiot Hiller is ready to play.
Thats what I call Always Earned Never Given.
Jack Adams Winner Coach Hartley.
|
He didn't change up anything, he went with one guy and kept going back to him win or lose.
I don't care about Ortio but he wasn't poor during training camp. Staple someone on the bench for weeks then blame them they were sluggish?