Two questions about Djokovic and him potentially being the GOAT:
1. Does it hurt him that it took Nadal and Federer getting old/injured for him to take over? i.e. when they were all close to their prime he was clearly number 3.
Or was he young enough to not be considered in his prime yet?
And two in regard to this comment:
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
I don't see any way of arguing that someone can be GOAT without at least taking over the top spot in slam wins in their career unless it's something like Nadal where the vast majority of the Slams come from one tournament.
|
Is that much different from Djokovic and hard court? Or is he getting future credit from expectations that he will win more at the French and Wimbledon?