View Single Post
Old 11-24-2015, 09:37 PM   #82
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway View Post
I should add to this post of mine:

Spoiler!


Russia also is operating SU-30s in Syria, which are extremely modern fighters, equivalent to an F/A-18E/F Super Hornet or F-15E Strike Eagle. They'd give everything in the sky except an F-22 a run for its money.

Also, the SU-34 is deployed in the region, it is mostly a strike-fighter, designed for Air-to-Ground and Air-to-Sea operations. It's more modern than the SU-30, but because of its design is not as capable in air-to-air operations.

A few weeks ago the US moved a few jets from a squadron of F-15C's from England to Turkey. This is interesting because this squadron trains exclusively in air-to-air combat, their jets are never, ever purposed for air-to-ground operations.

The US also has F-22s operating out of Al Dhafra in the UAE. It's fairly tragic the F-22 program was cut so short by politicians, as it's so vastly superior to anything else in the sky. In air-to-air operations, it would most likely hand the F-35 its lunch.

A potential scenario here is Russia deploying Anti-Air defenses in Syria. This would give Russia the capability to close off Syrian airspace to pretty much anything other than F-22s and B-1 Stealth bombers, and even then it would be problematic.
The F-22 and F-35 are vastly different with different roles, the raptor was cut short because of it's high cost but only after 180+ were built. The development of the F-35 had nothing to do with it.

Your point about Russia I was thinking the same thing, deploying modern fighters and AA into Syria and around the Turkey border is extremely likely, after this it could be Russia proclaiming a no fly zone.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote