Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootsy
I agree, the government should just rid itself of a firm deadline and issue a statement saying they will be admitting the 25,000 refugees as quickly, efficiently, with as thorough and proper vetting as possible. There will be no shortcuts taken. I think if they do that then there will be little resistance by the public and as far as I'm concerned there is no reason not to do this.
|
I hope this is the outcome.
I think pushing the 25k goal as a must though early in the planning stages is a good idea. It's tough to get people to think of ways to do things better and more efficiently. Asking can we take 25k refugees by the end of the year would result in the answer from the people involved of NO.
Saying we are going to bring in 25k refugees and do it safely. Tell me what resources you need to do it gets a different response. Even if it ends up we can only process 5k per month that's still 5 times more than the stays quo.
So pushing difficult is a better way to get things done than just accepting the status quo. As long as you have a smart leader who is willing to adjust to more realistic goals when required.