Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Precisely. Which is why willy nilly incorporation of refugees is such a dangerous game to play by Trudeau.
It isn't exactly a stretch to believe that with a limited vetting process on 25,000 people in the next 2 months, a handful of radicals will mix in with the legitimate requests and literally be met with open arms. That should be frightening to every Canadian, no matter what their political stripes.
Here are their own words on why they attacked Paris last night.
Scum of the earth people who only understand one way in confrontation.
To think Canada, or any Western democracy, shouldn't engage them at their level is obscenely naïve. These guys don't speak diplomatic language and never ever will as they have zero interest in peace.
Time for NATO (and Canada as a full member) to craft a strategy and come together to go after this group and annihilate them once and for all. Time for the rubber to meet the road so to speak.
No one wants the ugliness of war and the associated toll it will take, but sometimes the right choice is the painful one.
|
I sort of agree, if I am recalling correctly at the beginning stages of WW2 Great Britain seemed to take a fairly long wait and see approach before finally engaging the Nazi's in war, no? Somebody correct me if I'm wrong here. At some point I think it's probable that the best course of action is to engage and fight.
But what are your thoughts on the (IMO) very valid criticism of the strategy that engaging in warfare only breeds more of these people and problems and entrenches the hate even more?