Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagger
Did you bother to read the article? Merely being a scientist isn't a qualification. With Duncan, there are legitimate concerns about her ability to work with a team, not to mention highly questionable, if not ignorant scientific beliefs.
|
I did read it. You think she's unfit to lead because a previous colleague (who later wrote as the lead on the expedition himself as he wanted) and his daughter didn't like how she dressed or how she was "emotional"?
Her questionable belief was shared and still is by many others. We can play this charade with any given candidate.
Despite the National Post unsurprising attempt at a smear job, Trudeau chose a scientist who had led many projects, and was part of a Nobel Prize winning organization on Climate change.
Again, she's very qualified and far more than many, many previous ministers. Remember when Harper appointed a creationist chiropractor? Was your outrage so strong?