Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
If, hypothetically, a government scientist conducted a study whose conclusions were contrary to the broadly-accepted consensus regarding climate change, and the study was subjected to proper peer review by other experts in the field and judged to be scientifically valid, why would any "lefties" argue against the scientist publishing his or her findings and discussing them with the media?
|
Interesting.
NOW we think that opinions should be vetted and determined to be valid and accurate before they are released?
TAKE OFF THE MUZZLE YOU FASCIST.