Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey
Is the metric of Seguin leading the entire league better for you? Or should we go based on imaginary stats that didn't happen? Eriksson looks like he won't be around in Boston in a years time anyways so lets say he did have a few good years there. Was that any real benefit to them? Stars got a young superstar to build around for years to come. Their the best team in the West right now. Eriksson hurt or not the trade was still a massive win for Dallas.
|
I said that the deal with a healthy Eriksson is still a win for Dallas so I guess it is a good enough metric.
You said that we should do a similar steal of a deal to get Strome and I was pointing out that at the time of the deal it wasn't that big of a steal and ended up that way because of an injury.
So I guess if your point is we should trade a valuable piece to get Strome and then have him get a concussion then awesome but if not then comparing the Seguin deal to trading for Strome would have us moving a very valuable piece like Eriksson was after coming off 3 70+ point seasons and being a very good defensive player.