Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
B. The prosecutor didn't "tear apart" anything. The only thing he said that was remotely critical was the inference arising from his use of "so called". Aside from that he used qualifiers like "tended to contradict".
|
It feels like you're following a different case then everyone else. How could his words not be taken as tearing the case apart in that statement? As a non-lawyer that sounds like he tore it apart and then stopped just short of calling her a liar, only because he can't legally state that.