Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
I feel like GioforPM is the only person in the world that is disappointed that a rape didn't take place that night. He's still looking for ways to vilify Kane even though the prosecutor basically tore apart the accusations.
Party on you social crusader.
|
A. I haven't said a word about Kane - just the assumption that a dropped prosecution = a lying accuser. Oh, and the fact that a civil case can be brought and has been possible to win afterwards.
B. The prosecutor didn't "tear apart" anything. The only thing he said that was remotely critical was the inference arising from his use of "so called". Aside from that he used qualifiers like "tended to contradict".
C. Is "social crusader" the new "SJW"? If so, that's pretty much an automatic loss in a debate.
D. "All the attacks" I made? If truthful reference to your previous posts = attacks, OK. Otherwise, prove it.