Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
It was the perfect response. It's very clear the woman is a liar. While we will never know what did happen that night, we definitely now now that what she said didn't happen. She has done personal and professional harm to Patrick Kane, and if anyone has cause for a civil suit, it's him. Kane may be and have done questionable things, and possibly even some in this instance, but if the prosecutor can be considered a credible source, he didn't do what she claimed he did.
The whole thing is vile
|
How do you definitely know it didn't happen? The prosecutor just can't recommend a charge where he knows there will be reasonable doubt. He said the combined evidence "tended to contradict" her claim, which is a little short of "she's for sure lying". It simply means that he couldn't support a charge.
He also couldn't proceed because of the non-prosecution affidavit, since it would have become pretty difficult to carry on in that circumstance. I'm sure the death threats and twitter releases of her identity had something to do with that.