Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Well, as I read what he's saying it goes something like this:
1. A link between Al-Qaeda and Iraq was part of the justification the administration used before going into Iraq.
2. No such link exists.
3. The administration made false statements to justify a war that was clearly less urgent than they pretended.
I'm curious: which part of that "doesn't wash"? Looks pretty cut-and-dried to me. The only point that is under any debate is no. 1.
|
It was PART OF the justification.
Not all, and frankly not a major part.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|