Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNumbers
Realistically, the only stumbling block is uber needs to work with underwriters to create a "tweener" policy to cover these scenarios that does not throw the economics of driving uber casually / semi-professionally out the window.
Once that happens, I see no reason why the city wouldn't allow uber.... And it all seems pretty easily accomplished.
|
The only issue is uber is working with intact on a tweener policy. They can work all they want and if the provincial insurance council doesn't approve it we don't go anywhere. If taxi cartels have enough sway at the provincial level which I am sure they do this will be a drawn out process probably only solved once someone seriously gets hurt and there is a grey area for coverage