Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

FlamesAddiction · 11-03-2015, 01:02 PM

I would be more pissed if they stopped play immediately to review and determined that it was no-goal, but the fact no one on the ice even realized until intermission that it may have crossed the line, was just too late. There has to be a reasonable statute of limitations for when something gets reviewed.

I also agree that although it was likely in, there is no view that shows it 100% conclusively. Geometry doesn't matter since there was to be clear evidence that it was over the line, and not just projected to be over the line.

11-03-2015, 01:02 PM	#14
FlamesAddiction Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Vancouver Exp:	I would be more pissed if they stopped play immediately to review and determined that it was no-goal, but the fact no one on the ice even realized until intermission that it may have crossed the line, was just too late. There has to be a reasonable statute of limitations for when something gets reviewed. I also agree that although it was likely in, there is no view that shows it 100% conclusively. Geometry doesn't matter since there was to be clear evidence that it was over the line, and not just projected to be over the line. __________________ "A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."