Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
I am saying that the city issued a statement that one of the reasons they oppose UBER is because of no safety inspections on that vehicle. The problem with that stance is that...that same vehicle does not require any safety inspections as long as it isn't used to make the owner of the car a few bucks on the weekend driving that car. So their stance that it is a "public safety concern" is a load of horse puckey because that car, whether used as an uber or not, is still the same car whether it has one, two or 4 people riding in it and whether or not that driver is getting paid.
|
Well, the one guy here who said he was driving for Uber, said that if he hadn't done that this weekend, he would have stayed home and watched a movie. It may be the same car, but it's on the road more if it's used as an Uber car, so there is a difference.