Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle
No that's not the simple answer. Liability is huge in this case. The city has been sued before in vehicle accidents. If they outright say that Uber can run in city streets even though they're not insured properly that just opens them up for litigation.
|
But that can happen anyways can it not? What I mean whether or not its an uber driver with a fare or joe schmoe with a car full of buddies, is it not the same level of liability? Particularly if the city is not responsible for the licensing of said drivers...which they aren't.
Or maybe I am missing something?