I guess the greater thing for me in all this is this really an issue the Wildrose wants to get hung up on? Is it really a hill that needs to be defended to the utmost?
Couple this with FIldebrandt's foray with the media - globe and mail article and then refusing to answer that reporter's question in a post-budget scrum - and I begin to wonder about their comms/public relations focus.
They've taken a chunk of the story off of the budget, economic situation, etc and put it onto a petty disagreement with a reporter and this "can't have the leg start in the morning instead of the afternoon".
I don't get this approach - they've spun the attention off somewhat of issues they could score points on...onto these things instead?
|