09-08-2006, 06:50 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
Thank you very much for the informative replies. I tried to pick through them all to put together this post. These are my takes on what you guys have had to say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shane_c
I have a 42" Panasonic Plasma EDTV and am very happy with it. I have it connected to my Bell HD receiver. The picture on the HD channels is amazing.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newts
I have a 42" Samsung EDTV plasma and have an HD box hooked up...can't even tell the difference from the HDTV counterpart.
|
This is good to hear. I’m looking for a better picture than a SDTV but can’t afford a plasma HDTV. And:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
Most people can't tell a difference between the HD and ED 42 inch panasonic plasma fed by hd signals side by side from over about 10 feet away.
|
This is what I noticed in the store.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
I'll repeat what I've said before. If there is a big difference in price, and price is a concern, going with an EDTV in the 42 inch range is not a bad choice, especially if you'll be sitting a good distance away. I'd pick a good 42 inch ED plasma like a Panasonic over a cheap hdtv plasma.
EDTV is not going to be obsolete. EDTV's do a good job of showing HDTV, just not in its full resolution.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
For my wife and I, it was smarter to buy a name brand EDTV plasma as opposed to a Prima or Norcent or "Sorny" HDTV.
In essence, we are making the lower resolution of the EDTV work for us by magnifying fewer source flaws than an HDTV would.
|
The above quotes reflect my thoughts. I would rather buy a Panasonic EDTV than an off brand HDTV. Which it looks like Ken agrees with:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
Buying a Panasonic plasma EDTV would be better IMHO as well than buying an off brand plasma HDTV. (Way better in fact.)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Krack Korn
Well said, and I agree completely. Another factor to consider is in my experience, EDTVs do a better job of displaying non-HD channels (which still is, and will be for quite some time the vast majority of channels) than a full HDTV.
|
This is very important to me. I still want to watch CSI before passing out, 24 every week, the news and random sitcoms. I want to have a good picture quality for this.
However, this is now my sticking point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
What I was trying to suggest was (once again IMHO) it is better to go with a Panasonic LCD or DLP Projection than to buy a Panasonic plasma EDTV.
|
I’m concerned about response time in an LCD that I can afford. I don’t want the ghosting effect, but don’t think I can afford an LCD with <4ms response time. Or can I? Is there a good LCD HDTV in my budget that will have good picture quality for regular SD feeds of sports, sitcoms, news, etc...but definitely sports?
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Doors
I don't understand why anyone would get an EDTV vs a HDTV, but whatever floats your boat I guess.
|
Price…if we’re talking both plasmas. And picture quality on a non-HD feed if we're talking LCD HDTV vs. plasma EDTV.
Sooooo, this leaves me at the decision of buying a plasma EDTV or a LCD HDTV. $1500-$1800 is my TV budget (exclusive of cables, etc). No ghosting on regular channels is far more important to me than the extra bit of picture quality I get on an HD feed by going from plasma EDTV to LCD HDTV. Just so long as there is a significant upgrade in an HD feed with an EDTV compared to a SDTV. You dig?
Being an engineer, put it this way:
"An SD feed on a plasma EDTV" - "An SD feed on a LCD HDTV"
must be greater than
"An HD feed on a LCD HDTV" - "An HD feed on a plasma EDTV"
BTW, the Panasonic TH42PD60 is the plasma EDTV I am looking at. It is item 73 in today's Soundsaround flier. I was also considering Samsung's SPS4223 EDTV. It is the top right item on the front page of today's Future Shop flier. I have been told that Panasonic is a better route than the Samsung, though the Samsung will be $300 cheaper. If anyone feels an LCD HDTV would be better based on the above criteria, please recommend one.
And finally,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Krack Korn
By the time ALL channels are HD, you'll likely be ready for another new TV anyway.
|
This is correct.
|
|
|